Summary of the Argument
On July 8, 1741, Jonathan Edwards ascended the pulpit in Enfield, Connecticut, and delivered what would become the most famous sermon in American history: "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God." As Edwards read his manuscript in a monotone voice, the congregation erupted in cries of anguish. Men gripped the pews, convinced they were sliding into hell. Women fainted. The scene was repeated throughout New England and the Middle Colonies during the 1730s and 1740s in what historians now call the Great Awakening—the first major religious revival in American history and arguably the most significant event in shaping American evangelical Christianity.
The Great Awakening was not a single event but a series of revivals that swept through the American colonies between 1734 and 1745. It began with Edwards's 1734-1735 revival in Northampton, Massachusetts, gained momentum with George Whitefield's seven preaching tours between 1739 and 1770, and left an indelible mark on American religious, social, and political life. The revival raised fundamental questions that continue to shape evangelical theology: What constitutes authentic religious experience? How should emotion and reason relate in Christian faith? What authority does the institutional church possess over individual conscience? Can genuine conversion be distinguished from mere emotional excitement? These questions emerged from the intense debates between "Old Light" critics who viewed the revivals as dangerous enthusiasm and "New Light" defenders who saw them as genuine works of God's Spirit.
This article argues that the Great Awakening's theological significance lies not merely in its dramatic manifestations but in the sophisticated theological framework Edwards developed to evaluate religious experience. His Religious Affections (1746) remains the most penetrating analysis of religious experience in the English language, arguing that genuine conversion involves the transformation of the affections—the deep dispositions of the heart that govern all human action—rather than merely intellectual assent or emotional excitement. Edwards's twelve signs of genuine religious affections, culminating in the practice of Christian virtue, provided a framework for evaluating revival experiences that transcended both rationalist skepticism and enthusiastic credulity. Meanwhile, Whitefield's transatlantic ministry created a new model of evangelical cooperation that transcended denominational boundaries and laid the groundwork for the evangelical movement that would dominate American Protestantism for the next three centuries.
Historical Context and Origins
The Northampton Revival of 1734-1735
The Great Awakening began not with dramatic preaching but with a series of conversions among young people in Northampton, Massachusetts, in December 1734. Jonathan Edwards, who had succeeded his grandfather Solomon Stoddard as pastor in 1729, preached a series of sermons on justification by faith alone that sparked what he later described as "a very remarkable stirring and pouring out of the Spirit of God." Within six months, Edwards estimated that over 300 people—nearly the entire adult population of Northampton—had experienced conversion. The revival spread to neighboring towns throughout the Connecticut River Valley, creating what Edwards called "a time of extraordinary dullness in religion" transformed into "a time of remarkable awakening." Edwards's preaching emphasized Romans 3:28 ("For we hold that one is justified by faith apart from works of the law") and Ephesians 2:8-9 ("For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast").
Edwards documented this revival in A Faithful Narrative of the Surprising Work of God (1737), which was published in London and widely circulated throughout Britain and America. George M. Marsden notes in his magisterial biography Jonathan Edwards: A Life (2003) that this narrative "established Edwards's international reputation and provided a template for understanding revival that would shape evangelical expectations for generations." The Northampton revival demonstrated that genuine religious awakening could occur within the structures of established Congregational churches, not merely through itinerant preaching or emotional excess. However, the revival also revealed troubling aspects: some converts experienced extreme emotional distress, and one young woman, Edwards's uncle Joseph Hawley, committed suicide during the revival, raising questions about the psychological effects of intense religious conviction.
Whitefield's Transatlantic Ministry
George Whitefield transformed the Great Awakening from a regional phenomenon into a transatlantic movement. Born in Gloucester, England, in 1714, Whitefield experienced conversion at Oxford University in 1735 and was ordained in the Church of England in 1736. His first preaching tour of America in 1739-1740 drew unprecedented crowds—Benjamin Franklin estimated that Whitefield preached to 30,000 people on Boston Common, and his voice could be heard by crowds of 20,000 in Philadelphia. Harry S. Stout argues in The Divine Dramatist: George Whitefield and the Rise of Modern Evangelicalism (1991) that Whitefield "invented modern celebrity" through his use of advance publicity, newspaper coverage, and dramatic preaching style that anticipated modern mass media evangelism.
Whitefield's preaching emphasized the necessity of the new birth (John 3:3-7), the insufficiency of mere morality for salvation, and the free offer of the gospel to all who would believe. His Calvinistic theology, shaped by his reading of the Puritans and his friendship with the Wesley brothers at Oxford, stressed both divine sovereignty in salvation and human responsibility to respond to the gospel. Unlike Edwards, who preached from carefully crafted manuscripts, Whitefield preached extemporaneously with dramatic gestures and vocal variety that captivated audiences. His willingness to preach outdoors, in fields and marketplaces, broke with established church practice and democratized access to the gospel message.
The Old Light-New Light Controversy
The Great Awakening provoked fierce controversy within colonial churches. "Old Light" ministers, led by Charles Chauncy of Boston's First Church, criticized the revivals as promoting emotional excess, undermining clerical authority, and encouraging religious enthusiasm that bordered on fanaticism. Chauncy's Seasonable Thoughts on the State of Religion in New England (1743) argued that the revivals produced more harm than good, citing instances of people falling into trances, claiming direct revelations from God, and judging their ministers as unconverted. Old Lights insisted that true religion consisted primarily in rational understanding of doctrine and moral behavior, not emotional experience.
"New Light" ministers defended the revivals as genuine works of God's Spirit. They argued that true religion must engage the whole person—intellect, emotions, and will—and that the conversions produced by the revivals demonstrated their divine origin through transformed lives. However, New Lights themselves divided over the question of how to evaluate revival experiences. Edwards occupied a middle position, defending the revivals against rationalist critics while also warning against "enthusiastic" excesses that confused emotional excitement with genuine spiritual transformation. This controversy raised questions about religious authority, the nature of conversion, and the relationship between emotion and reason in Christian faith that continue to shape evangelical theology.
Edwards's Theology of Religious Affections
The Nature of True Religion
Edwards's A Treatise Concerning Religious Affections (1746) emerged from his attempt to distinguish genuine religious experience from its counterfeits during and after the Great Awakening. Edwards defined the affections as "the more vigorous and sensible exercises of the inclination and will of the soul"—not mere emotions but the deep dispositions of the heart that govern all human action. He argued that "true religion, in great part, consists in holy affections" because the affections determine what we love, what we desire, what we fear, and ultimately how we live. This emphasis on the affections as central to religious experience distinguished Edwards from both rationalist critics who reduced religion to intellectual assent and enthusiasts who equated religion with emotional excitement. Edwards insisted that genuine Christianity engages the whole person—mind, heart, and will—in a unified response to God's beauty and glory.
Edwards grounded his theology of the affections in Scripture, particularly in the great commandment to love God with all one's heart, soul, mind, and strength (Mark 12:30). He argued that the biblical prophets, apostles, and Christ himself displayed intense religious affections—joy, sorrow, desire, hope, zeal—and that the absence of such affections indicated spiritual deadness, not maturity. As Edwards wrote, "He who has no religious affection is in a state of spiritual death and is wholly destitute of the powerful, quickening, saving influences of the Spirit of God upon his heart." This theological framework provided a middle way between cold rationalism and uncritical enthusiasm. Edwards also appealed to 1 Peter 1:8 ("Though you have not seen him, you love him. Though you do not now see him, you believe in him and rejoice with joy that is inexpressible and filled with glory") as evidence that genuine faith produces profound emotional responses to Christ.
The Twelve Signs of Genuine Religious Affections
Edwards identified twelve distinguishing signs of truly gracious and holy affections, each carefully argued from Scripture and illustrated from pastoral experience. The first sign is that gracious affections arise from spiritual, supernatural, and divine influences upon the heart—they are not merely natural emotions but the work of the Holy Spirit. The second sign is that gracious affections have God as their foundation and object, not self. Edwards argued that false affections often arise from self-love—people love God because of what he does for them, not for who he is in himself.
The twelfth and culminating sign is that gracious affections produce Christian practice as their fruit. Edwards wrote, "Gracious and holy affections have their exercise and fruit in Christian practice. I mean, they have that influence and power upon him who is the subject of them, that they cause that a practice, which is universally conformed to, and directed by Christian rules, should be the practice and business of his life." This emphasis on practice as the ultimate test of genuine religious experience provided a safeguard against both antinomianism (the belief that grace frees believers from moral obligation) and mere emotional enthusiasm. Thomas S. Kidd notes in The Great Awakening: The Roots of Evangelical Christianity in Colonial America (2007) that Edwards's framework "provided evangelicals with sophisticated tools for self-examination that avoided both legalism and license."
The Doctrine of the New Birth
Central to Edwards's revival theology was the doctrine of the new birth, based on Jesus's words to Nicodemus: "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God" (John 3:3). Edwards argued that the new birth involves a supernatural transformation of the heart by the Holy Spirit, creating new spiritual capacities that enable a person to perceive and delight in spiritual realities. This transformation is not merely a change in behavior or belief but a fundamental reorientation of the affections toward God. Edwards used the analogy of physical sight: just as a blind person cannot see colors no matter how carefully they are described, so an unregenerate person cannot perceive spiritual beauty until the Spirit opens their eyes.
This doctrine had profound implications for Edwards's understanding of conversion. He rejected the Halfway Covenant that his grandfather Solomon Stoddard had championed, which allowed baptized but unconverted church members to participate in communion. Edwards insisted that only those who could give credible evidence of genuine conversion should be admitted to full church membership. This position cost him his pastorate in Northampton in 1750, when the congregation dismissed him after a bitter controversy. Yet Edwards's insistence on the necessity of genuine conversion became a defining characteristic of evangelical Christianity and shaped American revivalism for generations.
Whitefield's Contribution and the Transatlantic Evangelical Network
The Power of Dramatic Preaching
George Whitefield's preaching style revolutionized evangelical communication. Unlike the manuscript-reading style common among colonial ministers, Whitefield preached extemporaneously with dramatic gestures, vocal variety, and emotional intensity that captivated audiences. Benjamin Franklin, though skeptical of Whitefield's theology, was fascinated by his oratorical power and calculated that Whitefield's voice could reach 30,000 people in the open air. Franklin wrote in his autobiography that Whitefield's preaching was so persuasive that "one could not walk through the town in an evening without hearing psalms sung in different families of every street." The actor David Garrick reportedly said he would give a hundred guineas to be able to say "Oh!" like Whitefield.
Whitefield's sermons emphasized several key themes: the universal sinfulness of humanity, the necessity of the new birth, the free offer of salvation through faith in Christ alone, and the urgency of immediate decision. His sermon "The Method of Grace" (based on Jeremiah 6:14) attacked the false security of those who trusted in their morality or church membership rather than in Christ. He proclaimed, "Before you can speak peace to your hearts, you must be made to see, made to feel, made to weep over, made to bewail, your actual transgressions against the law of God." This emphasis on conviction of sin before consolation became a hallmark of evangelical preaching. Whitefield's preaching on Matthew 11:28 ("Come to me, all who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest") combined the terror of divine judgment with the sweetness of gospel invitation in a way that moved thousands to tears and repentance.
Creating a Transatlantic Evangelical Network
Whitefield's seven preaching tours of America between 1739 and 1770 created what historian Mark Noll calls in America's God: From Jonathan Edwards to Abraham Lincoln (2002) "the first genuinely transatlantic movement in the history of Protestantism." Whitefield maintained correspondence with evangelical leaders throughout Britain and America, published journals of his travels that were widely circulated, and used newspapers to advertise his preaching tours. This created a sense of evangelical identity that transcended denominational and geographic boundaries.
Whitefield's friendship with John Wesley, despite their theological differences over predestination, demonstrated that evangelical cooperation was possible across doctrinal divides. When Wesley published a sermon attacking Whitefield's Calvinism in 1740, Whitefield responded with a letter that, while defending his position, emphasized their agreement on the fundamentals of the gospel. He wrote, "Though we differ in some things, yet we are agreed in the great and fundamental doctrines of the gospel." This irenic spirit, combined with Whitefield's willingness to preach in churches of various denominations, helped create the transdenominational evangelical movement that would characterize American Protestantism.
The Social Impact of the Great Awakening
The Great Awakening had profound social and political consequences that extended far beyond the religious sphere. The revivals challenged traditional hierarchies by emphasizing that all people—rich and poor, educated and uneducated, men and women—stood equally as sinners before God and could experience the same transforming grace. Whitefield's willingness to preach to enslaved Africans and his insistence that they possessed souls capable of salvation (though he unfortunately did not oppose slavery itself) contributed to the development of African American Christianity. The revivals also promoted literacy, as converts sought to read the Bible for themselves, and encouraged the founding of colleges to train ministers, including Princeton (1746), Brown (1764), Rutgers (1766), and Dartmouth (1769).
Some historians argue that the Great Awakening contributed to the American Revolution by promoting individualism, challenging traditional authority, and creating networks of communication that transcended colonial boundaries. Frank Lambert contends in Inventing the 'Great Awakening' (1999) that the revivals "helped colonists develop a shared identity as Americans" and "provided a common vocabulary of liberty and tyranny that would be deployed in the revolutionary crisis." While this thesis remains debated, there is no question that the Great Awakening transformed American religious life and created the evangelical movement that would dominate American Protestantism for the next three centuries.
Relevance to Modern Church and Contemporary Significance
Evaluating Contemporary Revival Claims
Edwards's theology of religious affections provides invaluable resources for evaluating contemporary claims of revival and spiritual awakening. His insistence that genuine religious experience must produce lasting transformation of character, not merely temporary emotional excitement, offers a corrective to both skeptical dismissal of all religious experience and uncritical acceptance of every claim to spiritual encounter. The twelve signs of genuine religious affections provide a framework for pastoral discernment that honors both the reality of God's transforming work and the need for careful evaluation. Edwards's balanced approach remains remarkably relevant for contemporary pastors navigating claims of revival in their own congregations.
Contemporary renewal movements—from the charismatic movement of the 1960s and 1970s to the Toronto Blessing of the 1990s to current claims of revival on college campuses—raise the same questions that Edwards addressed: How can we distinguish genuine works of the Spirit from mere emotional manipulation or psychological phenomena? Edwards's answer remains relevant: look at the fruit. Do these experiences produce humility, love for God and neighbor, hunger for Scripture, hatred of sin, and perseverance in Christian practice? Or do they produce spiritual pride, divisiveness, neglect of Scripture, and moral compromise?
Implications for Ministry and Theological Education
For pastors and ministry leaders, the Great Awakening offers both inspiration and caution. Edwards's example demonstrates that theological depth and pastoral wisdom need not conflict with passionate preaching and genuine spiritual experience. His willingness to defend the revivals against rationalist critics while also critiquing their excesses models the kind of balanced leadership that contemporary churches need. Whitefield's example shows the power of clear gospel preaching, passionate delivery, and willingness to transcend denominational boundaries in service of the gospel.
The Great Awakening reminds us that God's Spirit works in surprising ways, often outside the boundaries of established institutions and conventional expectations. Yet it also reminds us that genuine revival produces not chaos but transformed lives characterized by love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, and self-control (Galatians 5:22-23). As Edwards wrote in the conclusion of Religious Affections, "Christian practice is the sign of signs, the evidence of evidences, that which seals and crowns all other signs." For those seeking to deepen their understanding of revival theology and church history, Abide University offers credentialing programs that recognize expertise in these areas while honoring the priority of genuine spiritual experience and pastoral wisdom.
Implications for Ministry and Credentialing
Edwards's theology of religious affections provides a sophisticated framework for evaluating contemporary revival claims and spiritual experiences. His twelve signs of genuine religious affections offer pastoral wisdom for discerning authentic spiritual transformation from mere emotional excitement. Whitefield's example demonstrates the power of clear gospel preaching combined with passionate delivery and transdenominational cooperation. For those seeking to deepen their understanding of revival theology, church history, and evangelical spirituality, Abide University offers credentialing programs that recognize expertise in these areas while honoring the priority of genuine spiritual experience and pastoral wisdom.
For ministry professionals seeking to formalize their expertise, the Abide University Retroactive Assessment Program offers a pathway to academic credentialing that recognizes prior learning and pastoral experience.
References
- Marsden, George M.. Jonathan Edwards: A Life. Yale University Press, 2003.
- Stout, Harry S.. The Divine Dramatist: George Whitefield and the Rise of Modern Evangelicalism. Eerdmans, 1991.
- Kidd, Thomas S.. The Great Awakening: The Roots of Evangelical Christianity in Colonial America. Yale University Press, 2007.
- Noll, Mark A.. America's God: From Jonathan Edwards to Abraham Lincoln. Oxford University Press, 2002.
- Lambert, Frank. Inventing the 'Great Awakening'. Princeton University Press, 1999.
- Edwards, Jonathan. A Treatise Concerning Religious Affections. Yale University Press, 1746.
- Chauncy, Charles. Seasonable Thoughts on the State of Religion in New England. Rogers and Fowle, 1743.